Get web site traffic analysis

The Thirty “Unknown” Laws Of The United States Debunked – Article Series By Harmon L. Taylor, JD. Part Two – (TCP)CHICAGO

Today's Headlines - (TCP)CHICAGO

The Bittersweet Player – Clear your browser cache to hear the latest play list.

Subtitle: Say It Ain’t So

Chief Editor’s Note: Those who follow our articles printed or our You Tube broadcast submissions know that this publication and broadcast platform, doesn’t print or broadcast news reports or editorial narrative for the sake of rapid content delivery for lots of good reasons. There’s nothing happening other than history repeating itself. It’s senseless to get lost in pop culture propaganda narrative posing as news information of importance to your lives which directly relates to the money you can earn or retain for your pocketbooks. That is to say, it only makes it onto our pages or into our broadcast submissions as a means of recording data, to hold those accountable for that data, or if it’s momentous and important.

For well over a couple of years now, this publication has been delving into many Internet feedback loops regarding the bad information being posited by unknown authors of unknown origins, whose assertions are some of the wildest conspiracies purporting to be “facts”.

Apparently, the conspiracy seeker freaks aka truthers aka freedom/liberty/patriot movement sympathizer’s are not paying attention to facts as much as they’re paying attention to a self absorbed “fear fix”.

One of the most successful “fear fix” websites at the forefront of “alternative news media” is Infowars, operated by Alex Jones. Fear sells. Not only does it sell, it creates commerce for a particular set of “solutions” posited to “cure” the fear. Mr. Jones does very well in selling it.

Here’s another example of “fear fix” websites: Assertions being made about an act congress, now known as (tongue in cheek) “the infamous act of 1871”. One of the more popular sites that chronicles this assertion is called The AntiCorruption [sic] Society. This link to that article decries a conspiracy. http://anticorruptionsociety.com/2010/03/05/the-usa-isnt-a-country-its-a-corporation/.

In relation to the above link by the quote unquote, AntiCorruption Society’s article (a name unsuitable because the information they put forward is in fact highly uninformed and corrupted), when this publication sought clarification and source documentation regarding the assertions being presented and after an email had been sent, we received nothing. Crickets.

However, an attorney in Alabama, one Mr. Larry Becraft has already debunked any notion of certainty that the Anti Corruption Society has any merit or certifiable veracity of sound research or position, for having made the assertion to begin with. You can see his response to that assertion at this link: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/lawmen/E56yTpJ67fw

In short don’t take anything The AntiCorruption [sic] Society website has to say seriously. It is garbage information.

-&-

Federalism, that concept of legal “agreement” by which this country operates as a consortium of government corporations, is lost on the minds of those who would presume to know a different set of facts citing the theory that it’s an act of nefarious measure meant to defraud rather than what it is, namely, a means of conducting the business of the people within any particular locale, whose corporate product is “deemed as” “public service” product activity. They are government corporations. They are codified in Title 31 of The United States Code.

Are government corporations legal? Yes, they are. Do government corporations rely on accounting practices which cloud their activity? Yes, they do. Are folks paying attention to the right set of facts or even paying attention at all? No, they’re not. For the record, stay tuned to this channel as we unravel these accounting practices in our report about Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports.

All of the above aside…

In this context we turn to the present work of Harmon L. Taylor, JD.

Mr. Taylor, as a friend to The Critical Post – Chicago has taken upon himself the task of supplementing the debunking efforts of several who precede him in this monumental effort regarding an offending list of assertions being purported as facts. This particular Internet feedback loop has propagated dozens, if not hundreds, of websites repeating information, which we regard as dangerous to the minds of folks who take things in vicariously, without checking the facts relating to these dangerous assertions. In many cases, it gets folks into a lot of trouble in the circuit courts of America. It causes loss of property and in some cases direct incarceration.

Harmon L. Taylor, among many other things, is a former member of the State Bar of Texas, who renounced his membership in that organization after a case judgment was handed down to him regarding his litigation in Terre Haute, Indiana. The objective of that effort on behalf of survivors to that tragedy was to preserve evidence, which meant stopping the execution of Timothy McVeigh, who was charged, tried, convicted, and sentenced to death for crimes associated with the Murrah Building Bombing in Oklahoma City, OK circa 1995. The case for the preservation of evidence, cited aspects, quite correctly, of The United States Constitution. The particulars of that litigation, too numerous to mention in print here, which included the confirmation that the Constitution was “of no authority,” caused Mr. Taylor, a Juris Doctorate from Southern Methodist University, to rethink his life’s work and to come at his legal work from a more correctly formatted approach.

For those interested we include our interview of Mr. Taylor. His qualifications to make these facts known are well respected by the staff here. To that end, we certify the audience can rely heavily upon Harmon’s citing of facts regarding what is our “legal reality” here in America.

The work cited by this publication is a public service and we are plesased to have been given permission by Mr. Taylor to reprint his findings in the matter of this Internet feedback loop which has taken its toll on too many.

At the bottom of this article are the offending assertions and pleased be advised up front, none of it is to be taken seriously.

This then, is the series of works by Harmon L. Taylor JD, which supplement the debunking effort already extant by several who have been skilled, scholarly debunkers for years, so as to help end, once and for all, any notion that anything cited by these unknown authors are to be regarded as certifiable or reliable citations and that is to say, dismiss them completely and never pay attention to them ever again.

– Pollack

-&-

If you missed Part One of this study it can be found by clinking on this link

Part Two

By Harmon L. Taylor, JD – Contributor To The Critical Post – Chicago

(TCP)Chicago – 24 OCTOBER 2015 – Attached is the essence of this Second Study of that list of 30+ statements.

What list? Here is the URL for this list of focus, this list of allegedly “unknown ‘laws.'”

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_nwo71.htm

This Second Study focuses on the list’s title, in particular the term “Law.”

The general point of this Second Study is that of the 30+ items collectively labeled as “laws,” there may be nine that qualify under such labeling.

This one takes longer to describe than it does to understand.

A concept is not an assertion of “law” just because that concept is found included or associated with something that we’d call a “citation” to law (or other authority or publication). Judicial rulings, for example, are typically meaningless without a discussion of the facts, because it’s the determination of the facts that renders relevant the applicable legal doctrines and theories. We learn only a little about the law where the recitation of facts is not included. Because the facts “have” to be there, a reference to those facts is just as possible to “cite” as a reference to the legal theories involved, the legal standard applied, or the holding of that ruling. So, whether it’s a judicial ruling, an administrative decision, legislative history, a treatise, a law review article, a legal encyclopedia, a dictionary, a newspaper, or whatever else is referred to by a formal “citation,” it’s just as possible to “cite” to assertion of fact as it is to “cite” to assertion of legal standards and holdings as it is to “cite” this party’s or that party’s argument, objection, claim, defense, or position. The existence of a “citation” to authority in no way means that the text or concept so cited is a statement of “law.”

That took longer to explain than it does to understand.

Hopefully, to the great majority of the Members of this List, this concept is a statement of the obvious, a simple confirmation of an idea already well in mind.

Clearly, however, because that list of statements still circulates under that labeling, namely “law,” it’s not obvious enough, yet, generally. And, where that’s the level of “thought” that finds the list attractive, doesn’t that bring with it its own “message?”

Per this Second Study, we are reminded that facts and law are (typically) different (sometimes “laws” are the “facts”) and that it matters that we know the difference. Are we of any remote benefit even to ourselves, much less to someone else, where we can’t distinguish “fact” (or “argument”) from “law?”

As mentioned in the First Study, the text of those links fairly well asserted the point in this Second Study, already. In general, as far as the numbered statements are concerned, this author can find at most nine statements that might actually qualify as statements of law. Seven of the nine are set in lavender background shading. Two of those nine are arguable; hence, the gray background shading. We gain very little by making that determination (at this time, perhaps at any time) as to lavender or gray. If it were one, maybe even two, out of the list, and the labeling were debatable, this point wouldn’t be raised. Because it’s less than 1/3 that qualify under such labeling, what is made manifest is our inability to distinguish “fact” (“argument,” etc.) from “law.”

The colorization of the list items makes the point. There’s a lot of non-colored content, there. Supporting this point, namely that we’re not looking at a list of “laws,” is a highlighted statement at the bottom of the list of focus. See attached .pdf file. That title is highlighted in light blue. That title uses the term “facts.” This author is far more inclined to see that list as a list of “facts,” or “observations,” or analysis points, or arguments, than he is inclined to label these items as “laws.”

It’s important to note that this point about (gross, obvious) mis-labeling doesn’t directly reflect on the original authors / researchers. Part of the motivation that produced the list of links in that First Study was to determine how that the original list was labeled / titled. If it had a labeling or collective titling, such original was a bit more suitable (if titled at all). That said, if that list started circa 2006, the morphed version of focus here is of 2008. That’s still seven years that such list has been “out there” under that mis-labeling, and it’s still circulating with that mis-labeling. Therefore, it’s clear that as a community “called” to study into such matters we’ve lost our ability to determine “fact” (and “argument,” etc.) from “law.” That observation of our present condition is so tragic that this author is greatly motivated to engage this discussion.

To be sure, the fact that we’re looking at the whole of the list and deciding that there’s only a few of them that qualify as statements of “law” in no way means that such statements that actually match the labeling are correct or even competent. All that this author is saying by this Second Study is that the collective labeling is manifestly errant, and, as such, such mis-labeling should have been corrected years ago. And, seven years later, we still don’t know the difference well enough to decline to circulate such matters under such plain mis-labeling.

As for the correctness or even competence of these particular (nine) statements, that’s the substance of the next following Studies. In the next nine Studies, this author will examine each of these nine numbered items as “dead wrong” or “true, but so what?”

Thus, the list, seven years later, is still grossly mis-labeled, and we ought to be able to recognize that manifest mismatch by even a casual perusal of the content (and, recognizing such mismatch, decide not to continue to circulate it).

Toward those nine numbered statements that may qualify under the labeling of “law,” we now turn our attention.

-&-

Author’s Note: Some of these Studies and points within these Studies are very likely to carry some energy and some very straight talk and evaluation. Some of it may curl even Kojak’s hair.

Everyone has a contribution to make. To be given “sight” enough to see that there’s a problem regarding “law” and “government” is to be “called” into that community that exists to “do something about it.” Different people make different contributions, and a rather select few make the tremendous contribution of “taking the field of competition” and actually risking property and liberty by running various ideas and theories up the flag pole to see who salutes.

At whatever position we may find ourselves, we’re (A) in the supply line if we’re not (B) on the front line (of administrative/judicial, “Let my people and myself go!” activity). No effort of this magnitude can function without a competent and dependable supply line. Just can’t work without such. So, the supply line is a very important part of the effort. Thus, where the supply line is passing around intellectual poison, those on the front line or who are enticed to take a front line position are dead where they stand. In other words, we’re not helping the ones on the “front line” of application by filling their minds with rubbish.

The early “front line” folks were 100% absolutely, totally convinced not only that we had a “constitution” but also that such source of “authority” was directly relevant to the issues at hand, in particular in the “tax” area. If they had known that there was no “constitution,” would they have been “front liners?” If they had known that even if there were a “constitution,” the “constitution” had nothing, whatsoever, to do with either the problem or the solution, would they have been “front liners?”

The point is that in a very real sense, the information, itself, selects the advocates of it, i.e., the “front liners” of that information, position, perspective. Those who are learning and applying the reality are simply a different group of Americans than those who are generating and circulating the non-sense. Eagles don’t flock, but they do support one another, and they do reproduce more eagles. Where this or that information is recognized and/or exposed as “bad,” then a whole group of would-be “front liners” of that perspective are motivated and encouraged to do something else with their time, “money,” Money, and energy. Drastic down-side consequences are avoided.

As should be self-apparent, we’re not helping ourselves by continuing to circulate non-sense. This, “Let’s break INTO jail together” mentality has got to stop.

Time, “money,” and energy are limited resources. As a community, we have a limited number of minds and hearts willing to apply this or that theory on the “front line” and then take it far enough to see if it “works.” (Why that’s still a priority to some is unknown, given that the fundamentals of the reality are, and have been, available.) Especially on the paths that have already been trod, to no beneficial result, where we “waste” those people and their energy, we may as well have just thrown a ton of gold to the bottom of the ocean.

Some “front liners,” such as Larry Becraft, have seen and experienced more than anyone’s fair share of misery that follows from doing everything legally possible to defend against and to prevent the downside, only to realize that there was simply no way to cure the problem once it got started that way. So, why does Becraft debunk? Why has he invested a significant percentage of his career debunking these various “theories?” For the very self-obvious reason that he cares a great deal about the people who voluntarily (and ignorantly, no matter how well-meaningly) position themselves to get bulldozed by this system. He’s one of several who have seen more than anyone should have to experience the total waste of life that develops in the pursuit of obvious canon-fodder bait concepts. So, where he can reach a mind in time to avoid that level of disaster, then his investment of himself, and his time, is worth it.

Why does anyone debunk? Why would there be a news source such as The Critical Post – Chicago, that focuses for a large part of its effort on the quest to debunk the non-sense? Because there are known experiences, some quite close to home, where “bad” information produced an unaffordable loss of property, liberty, or both. Those paths produced absolutely nothing of gain and totally of loss. We can’t protect people from themselves, but where the obviously incompetent concepts are not exactly obviously incompetent to all who encounter such concepts, there may be some benefit, some decrease of the down side, by providing information that points out another side, or the other side, of the perspective that’s popularly circulating but which should never have gotten started in the first place.

This author’s debunking is merely adjunct to the long-time efforts of those who have made it their career to debunk these various nutsoid theories, whether from the legal side or the news side or the economics side or the accounting side, etc.

Those in the supply line who haven’t experienced, whether vicariously, i.e., as counsel, or directly the devastation of a life and/or a family as a consequence of someone’s having acted “under the influence” of bad swill don’t have quite the energy to put an end to this sort of thing as those who have so experienced that sort of consequence. Those in the supply line who haven’t tasted the sting of losing a position which loss results in incarceration of self or of another don’t yet have an internal motivation to filter what they generate or pass along. Since many in the supply line have no intention of ever applying anything, they simply don’t have the same level of concern regarding the credibility of what is (re-)circulated. They feel that they’re making a contribution by keeping the “information” flowing, and they don’t stop to consider the fact that the best contribution possible might be the cessation of circulation of this or that concept or set of concepts.

As it would happen, during the drafting of this P.S., a note came in addressing this very study. What the content of that note confirms is personal knowledge of reliance by others on the very information of focus in these Studies and that those others have been sent to jail. That note is from someone who has been on the “front line” for many, many years.

The point is that the ideas of that list are not only of no benefit but also are confirmed as having contributed to the end result of jail. That’s exactly where this sort of “information” puts people who don’t yet have quite enough analytical exposure to these matters to know not to touch them with a 10-foot pole.

It’s unknown how many people might have jail, or litigation altogether, if they had had something in the way of debunking to review, or, better, no exposure to such list, at all. It’s been the trait among the “patriot community” from the start to help one another “break INTO jail.” First time through on an idea, there may (or may not) be value in running the new perspective / idea / theory up the flagpole. Let’s say that happens, i.e., it’s new and it’s run up the flagpole. Given the possibilities of evidentiary problems or procedural problems, should that the same idea get several different applications isn’t necessarily bad. Those coming up short pay a high price, but it’s not inherently bad that new perspectives be put into the crucible of the lab known as “life.”

However, that said, even if we didn’t know our present reality, i.e., even if there were a new idea sound enough to treat in that manner, once a few materially different runs produce the same bad result, it’s time to move on to something else. Trying the same unworkable concept year after year after year, on essentially the same fact patterns, is the classic definition of nuts. Running the same unworkable perspective or theory over and over and over is trying the same thing the same way and yet expecting, somehow, a different result, which is the classic definition of being nuts.

This particular list under this grossly errant labeling has been available for seven years; nine years (perhaps longer) under more generic labeling. While we’re looking at what is there, let’s look at something that’s not there. Where’s any confirmation, at all, from anyone who actually depended on any of this, that anything beneficial developed. Where’s any confirmation of that, at all? The “information” circulates, here, for seven years, now, with this labeling, nine years under prior labeling, but without any confirmation of benefit, at any time, to or for anyone. That should be it’s own message. “Information” of that “vintage,” let’s call it, “information” that’s been “out there” for this length of time, will surely have a history of application to accompany it. (P.T. Barnum knew us all too well.) So, where’s that history, and what does that history teach? This “information,” of this duration of “fermentation,” as accompanied by absolutely nothing positive in the way of application results, shouldn’t even have to be thought about twice before opting not to continue its perpetuation.

Ideas have consequences, and what we (re-)circulate may be just the ticket by which some poor sap out here manages to “break INTO jail.” Where there’s an increase in the sense of responsibility by the re-circulators for what’s (re-)circulated, especially in the area of “tax,” then such lists and related “information” will find a refreshingly lower (re-)circulation volume; hence, a (greatly) decreased coverage. The supply line members who are (far) more interested in sending out emails than in taking a “front line” position based on what they’re circulating simply don’t have that level of personal concern that would motivate them to stop circulating the intellectual poison.

To them, a “take home” message from this series of Studies is this: Have a heart; don’t ignorantly poison your neighbor’s mind. To the supply line participants, who have a very important role to play, if the information is of such doubtful content that you’re not going to act on it, why would you want to circulate it to anyone else? Do some self-filtering. It’s Ok to stop circulating the non-sense.

The debunking effort can’t reach everyone. Debunking can’t prevent all problems where someone finds tasty the flavor of cannon-fodder-bait flavored swill and who consumes such swill by the gallons. But, for every mind reached by debunking that is dissuaded from doing anything (further) based on those ideas, this effort is worth the time investment.

Toward what this author can do with/about this one, we move forward, full throttle, with full deliberation.

-&-

Today's Headlines - (TCP)CHICAGO
Donate to The Critical Post

1 comment to
The Thirty “Unknown” Laws Of The United States Debunked – Article Series By Harmon L. Taylor, JD. Part Two – (TCP)CHICAGO

Leave a Reply

Calendar

Staff Notes To Readers

We are continually looking to improve our performance for this readership. Please leave suggestions in any particular comment box for any article.

If you're a reporter, we'd enjoy hearing from you.

We appreciate your continued support and visitations.

Thank You - (TCP)CHICAGO Staff

  • MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. Reports Good Earnings Trend January 23, 2019
    FAIRFAX, Va., Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (OTCQX: MNSB) (the "Company") reported a strong quarter-on-quarter earnings trend. Fully adjusted earnings per share for both common and diluted shares was $0.45 for the fourth quarter of 2018, compared to $0.14 for...
  • OnlyBoth Inc. Rethinks Healthcare Benchmarking to Deliver on Distinct Evaluation Needs January 23, 2019
    PITTSBURGH, Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- OnlyBoth Inc. has launched three new evaluation engines, complementing its original benchmarking engine, designed to meet the healthcare industry and consumer demand for comprehensive provider comparisons. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based...
  • PlayUp Ltd and 123Gaming dissolve acquisition deal January 23, 2019
    SYDNEY, Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- PlayUp has decided to terminate its acquisition of US gaming platform 123gaming. PlayUp held concern over the ownership of IP, commercial viability, supplier agreements, payment gateways, and profitability. PlayUp Ltd CEO Mr Daniel Simic provided the...
  • Top IoT Platforms Announced in MachNation's 2019 IoT Application Enablement Scorecard January 23, 2019
    BOSTON, Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- MachNation announces the availability of its IoT Application Enablement Platform (AEP) ScoreCard for 2019, a detailed rating of 20 Internet of Things (IoT) platform vendors. According to MachNation forecasts, worldwide IoT application enablement and...
  • Bhargav Shah Joins One Technologies as Chief Technology Officer January 23, 2019
    DALLAS, Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- One Technologies, LLC announces that Bhargav Shah has joined the firm as Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer. Mr. Shah, who is based in Dallas and reports to Chief Executive Officer Sanjay Baskaran, will lead creating a customer-centric ...
  • Elevation Financial Group Announces Sale Of Louisiana Property For $15.5 Million January 23, 2019
    ORLANDO, Fla., Jan. 22, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Elevation Financial Group, provider of senior and multifamily affordable housing, is pleased to announce the disposition of Serenity Apartments at Baton Rouge, an Elevation Real Property Fund V asset. The 328-unit multifamily community sold for ...
  • Major Streaming Companies Threatened by Fortnite as Gaming Communities Capitalize on eSports Explosion January 23, 2019
    NEW YORK, January 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- FN Media Group Presents Microsmallcap.com Market Commentary Analysts are now calling eSports and egaming the greatest investment opportunity of the past few years, and the proof is in the threat it poses to competitors. In a recent letter to...
  • "How-To-Gamble" Videos on YouTube Surpass 27 Million Views - Best-Selling Author/Expert Gives FREE Tips For Casino-Goers to Become Smarter Gamblers January 23, 2019
    DANIA BEACH, Fla., Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- There's little doubt that gambling is a hobby that many Americans hold dear to their hearts. In fact, whole cities have even been built around it, and some of the games have been elevated to the level of a televised sport. With all that...
  • Access Fixtures Expands Line of No UV Products January 23, 2019
    WORCESTER, Mass., Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Access Fixtures has added new high bay LED luminaires to its No UV - No Light Below 450nm product lineup. Until now, it was a challenge for facilities that required no UV high bay lighting to meet corporate and OSHA footcandle requirements....
  • RYU Apparel Announces Non-Brokered Private Placement January 23, 2019
    VANCOUVER, Jan. 23, 2019 /PRNewswire/ - RYU Apparel Inc. (TSXV: RYU, OTCQB: RYPPF) ("RYU" or the "Company"), creator of urban athletic apparel, is pleased to announce that it proposes a non-brokered private placement offering (the "Offering") to raise up to $6,000,000 by the issuance of...

Support The Critical Post – – Click This Ad

  • Bill passes allowing electric cooperatives to offer internet January 23, 2019
    JACKSON, Miss. (AP) - Mississippi lawmakers are passing a measure to allow the state's electric cooperatives to offer high-speed internet service. The Senate voted unanimously Wednesday for House Bill 366 , sending it to Gov. Phil Bryant for his signature or veto. The measure would let Mississippi's 25 electric cooperatives ...
    JEFF AMY
  • Union at Audi plant in Hungary to hold week-long strike January 23, 2019
    BUDAPEST, Hungary (AP) - A union of autoworkers at a plant in Hungary of German carmaker Audi says it will launch a week-long strike after unsuccessful negotiations over wages and benefits with the company. The strike to begin Thursday morning follows a two-hour warning strike last week by around 30 ...
  • NASA replaces astronaut on Boeing's 1st crew launch January 23, 2019
    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) - NASA has replaced an astronaut assigned to Boeing's first launch with a crew. Astronaut Eric Boe was pulled Tuesday from the upcoming test flight for unspecified medical reasons, after more than three years of training. Taking his seat will be Mike Fincke, a former space ...
    MARCIA DUNN
  • New building for Pacific Northwest National Lab campus January 23, 2019
    RICHLAND, Wash. (AP) - The federal government's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory will build a new $90 million energy sciences research building on its Richland campus. A contract to design and construct the building has been awarded to a Houston-based team of Harvey Cleary Builders and Kirksey Architecture. The Tri-City Herald ...
  • Little taking applications for Idaho oil and gas commission January 23, 2019
    BOISE, Idaho (AP) - Idaho Gov. Brad Little is accepting applications for a spot on the five-member Idaho Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. Little made the announcement on Tuesday to fill the fifth spot on the commission that oversees oil and natural gas production in the state. The commission is ...
  • State: Nearly $24M in legal pot sales in first 2 months January 23, 2019
    BOSTON (AP) - Pot shops in Massachusetts have racked up nearly $24 million in sales since the first ones opened two months ago. That's according to the Cannabis Control Commission, the state's marijuana regulatory agency. The first retail stores in Massachusetts - and anywhere on the U.S. East Coast - ...
  • Employee? Independent contractor? How to keep it legal January 23, 2019
    NEW YORK (AP) - Small business owners who want to use independent contractors need to be sure these workers really aren't employees. Federal and state government agencies are on the lookout for businesses that use independent contractors, or freelancers, to evade Social Security, Medicare and unemployment taxes and workers compensation ...
    JOYCE M. ROSENBERG
  • The Latest: EU: Irish border still issue in no-deal Brexit January 23, 2019
    LONDON (AP) - The Latest on Britain's exit from the European Union (all times local): 3:30 p.m. The European Union's chief Brexit negotiator says if Britain withdraws without a deal with the EU, he still wants to avoid a hard border between Ireland and Northern Ireland. Michel Barnier said at ...
  • Fire officials: Man fatally run over by own vehicle January 23, 2019
    MIDDLETOWN, Conn. (AP) - Fire officials say a 75-year-old Connecticut man was killed when his own car slid down his icy driveway and rolled onto him. Middletown South Fire District Chief Michael Howley says 75-year-old Rodley Russo died as a result of his injuries Monday afternoon. The Connecticut Post reports ...
  • Forgoing staffers, many businesses turn to freelancers January 23, 2019
    NEW YORK (AP) - It hasn't been lost on small business owners that Uber and other ride-sharing services are enormously successful without having employees doing the work. It's one of the reasons why small companies are forgoing employees in favor of independent contractors. Todd Miller transformed his small business a ...
    JOYCE M. ROSENBERG
  • Montana lawmakers take up bills on straws, plastic bags January 23, 2019
    HELENA, Mont. (AP) - Two bills sponsored by a Missoula senator wending their way through the Legislature could change life as some Montanans know it by limiting plastic straws in retail food establishments and charging for plastic bags in stores. And there is a bill by another lawmaker that would ...
    PHIL DRAKE
  • Bill would make it tougher to pass tax hikes in Montana January 23, 2019
    HELENA, Mont. (AP) - Montana may join 15 other states in making it more difficult to pass new or increased taxes. A simple majority of the state Legislature can currently approve new taxes or fees. But House Bill 148 introduced Tuesday would raise that threshold to a two-thirds supermajority, Montana ...
    CORIN CATES-CARNEY
  • Idaho Geological Survey seeks budget increase January 23, 2019
    BOISE, Idaho (AP) - The agency that provides information about Idaho's geology and minerals and makes natural gas and oil production records available is asking state lawmakers to approve a $1.25 million budget. University of Idaho President Chuck Staben made the request for fiscal year 2020 for the Idaho Geological ...
  • Nets minority owner buys WNBA's Liberty January 23, 2019
    NEW YORK (AP) - The New York Liberty have a new owner and get to keep their NBA ties. An investment group led by Brooklyn Nets minority owner Joseph Tsai has bought the Liberty, the WNBA announced Wednesday. Terms were not disclosed. Tsai, co-founder of the e-commerce giant Alibaba Group, ...
    DOUG FEINBERG
  • Federal employees missing work during shutdown could be marked as AWOL January 23, 2019
    Federal workers who are required to work during the partial government shutdown but are failing to do so risk being classified as absent without leave. A memo sent from the director of the Office of Personnel Management to heads of department and agencies on Friday explained that employees ...
    Gabriella Muñoz
  • Owners of former furniture store get manufacturing permit January 23, 2019
    BENNINGTON, Vt. (AP) - The new owners of a former furniture store in Bennington, Vermont, have received zoning for light manufacturing. The new permit will allow Polar Composite Corp., LLC to continue to utilize the 17,000-square foot building, which has gone unused since last January. The Bennington Banner reports the ...
  • Blue Origin shoots NASA experiments into space in test January 23, 2019
    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) - Jeff Bezos' rocket company, Blue Origin, has launched NASA experiments into space on a brief test flight. The New Shepard rocket blasted off Wednesday from West Texas, hoisting a capsule containing the experiments. The eight experiments were exposed to a few minutes of weightlessness, before ...
    MARCIA DUNN
  • Muriel Bowser, D.C. mayor, offers zero-interest loans to workers affected by shutdown January 23, 2019
    D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said Wednesday her city will offer zero-interest loans of up to $5,000 to people who might not be able to make their next mortgage payment because of the partial government shutdown. Ms. Bowser, a Democrat, said the $9 million program will be managed by the city's ...
    Tom Howell Jr.
  • Georgia SOS seeks to replace criticized voting machines January 23, 2019
    ATLANTA (AP) - Georgia's new elections chief is asking lawmakers for $150 million to replace the state's aging electronic voting machines, which experts have warned are vulnerable to hacking. Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger told Georgia legislators holding budget hearings Wednesday that a new voting system is his top priority. ...
  • The Latest: Senator argues fertility fraud law isn't needed January 23, 2019
    INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - The Latest on Indiana Legislature's action on fertility fraud bill (all times local): 11:30 a.m. A state senator says he believes Indiana law already allows criminal charges against the fertility doctor who authorities say used his own sperm to impregnate perhaps dozens of women. A Senate committee ...