Get web site traffic analysis

Terms of Use

FAIR USE NOTICE. Many of the stories on this site contain copyrighted material whose use has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making this material available in its efforts to advance the understanding of environmental issues and sustainability, human rights, economic and political democracy, and issues of social justice. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of the copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use such copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’…you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, politica, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 

United States Code: Title 17, Section 107 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/107.html

Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include – (1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (2) the nature of the copyrighted work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.

United States Code: Title 17, Section 106 Chapter 1 – Subject Matter And Scope of Copyright http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/unframed/17/106.html

 

Subject to sections 107 through 120, the owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (1) to reproduce the copyrighted work in copies or phonorecords; (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work; (3) to distribute copies or phonorecords of the copyrighted work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; (4) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and motion pictures and other audiovisual works, to perform the copyrighted work publicly; (5) in the case of literary, musical, dramatic, and choreographic works, pantomimes, and pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works, including the individual images of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, to display the copyrighted work publicly; and (6) in the case of sound recordings, to perform the copyrighted work publicly by means of a digital audio transmission.

TO: Members of the Faculty, Hoover Institution Fellows,

Academic Staff, and Library Directors
FROM: Condoleezza Rice,Provost
RE: Copyright Reminder October 30, 1998

This memorandum provides a general description of the applicability of the copyright law and the so-called “fair use” exemptions to the copyright law’s general prohibition on copying. It also describes “safe harbor” guidelines applicable to classroom copying.

The federal copyright statute governs the reproduction of works of authorship. In general, works governed by copyright law include such traditional works of authorship as books, photographs, music, drama, video and sculpture, and also software, multimedia, and databases. Copyrighted works are protected regardless of the medium in which they are created or reproduced; thus, copyright extends to digital works and works transformed into a digital format. Copyrighted works are not limited to those that bear a copyright notice. As a result of changes in copyright law, works published since March 1, 1989 need not bear a copyright notice to be protected under the statute.

Two provisions of the copyright statute are of particular importance to teachers and researchers:

* a provision that codifies the doctrine of “fair use,” under which limited copying of copyrighted works without the permission of the owner is allowed for certain teaching and research purposes; and

* a provision that establishes special limitations and exemptions for the reproduction of copyrighted works by libraries and archives.

The concept of fair use is necessarily somewhat vague when discussed in the abstract. Its application depends critically on the particular facts of the individual situation. Neither the case law nor the statutory law provides bright lines concerning which uses are fair and which are not. However, you may find it helpful to refer to certain third party source materials. Guidelines for classroom copying by not-for-profit educational institutions have been prepared by a group consisting of the Authors League of America, the Association of American Publishers, and an ad hoc committee of educational institutions and organizations. In addition, fair use guidelines for educational multimedia have been prepared by a group coordinated by the consortium of College and University Multimedia Centers (CCUMC). These guidelines describe safe harbor conditions, but do not purport to define the full extent of “fair use.”

The guidelines, as well as other source material, are available through a variety of resources, including through the world wide web site http://fairuse.stanford.edu. Stanford University Libraries & Academic Information Resources, in collaboration with the Council on Library Resources and FindLaw Internet Legal Resources, are sponsors of this web site. The site assembles a wide range of materials related to the use of copyrighted material by individuals, libraries, and educational institutions. I hope that the discussion below helps to clarify further the nature of “fair use.”

I. Fair Use for Teaching and Research

The “fair use” doctrine allows limited reproduction of copyrighted works for educational and research purposes. The relevant portion of the copyright statue provides that the “fair use” of a copyrighted work, including reproduction “for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research” is not an infringement of copyright. The law lists the following factors as the ones to be evaluated in determining whether a particular use of a copyrighted work is a permitted “fair use,” rather than an infringement of the copyright:

* the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;

* the nature of the copyrighted work; * the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole, and

* the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Although all of these factors will be considered, the last factor is the most important in determining whether a particular use is “fair.” Where a work is available for purchase or license from the copyright owner in the medium or format desired, copying of all or a significant portion of the work in lieu of purchasing or licensing a sufficient number of “authorized” copies would be presumptively unfair. Where only a small portion of a work is to be copied and the work would not be used if purchase or licensing of a sufficient number of authorized copies were required, the intended use is more likely to be found to be fair.

A federal appeals court recently decided an important copyright fair use case involving coursepacks. In Princeton University Press, et.al. v. Michigan Document Services, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit concluded that the copying of excerpts from books and other publications by a commercial copy service without the payment of fees to the copyright holders to create coursepacks for university students was not fair use. The size of the offending excerpts varied from 30 percent to as little as 5 percent of the original publications. Although the opinion in this case is not binding in California, it is consistent with prior cases from other courts, and there is a reasonable likelihood that the California federal courts would reach a similar conclusion on similar facts.

Where questions arise, we suggest that you consult the guidelines for classroom copying and other available source material available on the fair use web site, cited above. Please note that the guidelines are intended to state the minimum, not the maximum, extent of the fair use doctrine. Thus, just because your use is not within the guidelines, it is it not necessarily outside the scope of fair use. In the absence of a definitive conclusion, however, if the proposed use deviates from the guidelines, you should consider obtaining permission to use the work from the copyright owner. In instances where the fair use question is important and permission would be difficult or expensive to obtain, a member of the Fair Use Advisory Group (described below) or the Legal Office can assist in analyzing whether a particular proposed use would constitute “fair use.”

Some photocopying services will obtain copyright permission and add the price of the royalties, if any, to the price of the materials. A request to copy a copyrighted work should generally be sent to the permission department of the publisher of the work.

Permission requests should contain the following:

* Title, author, and/or editor, and edition

* Exact material to be used, giving page numbers or chapters

* Number of copies to be made

* Use to be made of the copied materials

* Form of distribution (classroom, newsletter, etc.)

* Whether the material is to be sold Draft form letters can be obtained from or reviewed by a member of the Fair Use Advisory Group or the Legal Office.

For certain works, permission may also be sought from the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) which will quote a charge for works for which they are able to give permission. The Copyright Clearance Center can be contacted at www.copyright.com or (978) 750-8400, but it may be easier to go through a copying service that deals regularly with the CCC.

II. Course Reserves

Some libraries at Stanford will refuse to accept multiple photocopies or to make photocopies of copyrighted materials needed for course reserves without first having permission from the copyright holder. Other libraries on campus will accept a limited number of photocopies for course reserves. Consult individual libraries for clarification of their policies.

While the libraries have blanket permission from dozens of journals, obtaining permission sometimes takes a good deal of time. Experience in obtaining permission has shown that an inquiry addressed to a journal publisher frequently produces information that the copyright is actually held by the author, and four weeks is often inadequate to obtain such permission. Four to six weeks is considered the norm.

Permission may be obtained in a number of ways:

* Upon request, some libraries on campus will obtain materials for course reserve. In these cases, the librarian will write to obtain permission to photocopy or to purchase reprints. However, most libraries do not provide this service.

* Written permission may be obtained by the academic department.

* Oral permission may be obtained by faculty members, departmental secretaries, or library staff, in which case a written record is needed of that action.

Note that filling course reserve requirements may require two to three months before the quarter begins if the library does not already have a copy of the publication, if the publication is out of print, or if the copyright holder is not readily available.

III. Resources Additional information on copyright issues may be found on the world wide web site http://fairuse.stanford.edu.

Questions about the copyright law as it affects faculty and staff in their University capacities should be directed to a member of the Fair Use Advisory Group (see attachment) or to Linda Woodward in the Legal Office (3-9751), who can put you in touch with the appropriate lawyer to respond to your specific question. Questions about library policy and course reserves should be addressed to Assunta Pisani, Associate Director, University Libraries (apisani@sulmail or 3-5553). Information concerning the application of copyright law to computer software can be found in the memorandum “Copying of Computer Software” distributed by the Library and Information Resources and in Administrative Guide Memorandum 62.

Thank you for your cooperation in ensuring the observation of these guidelines.

The information comprised on this site in not offered or held to be a solicitation of the views, ideas or policies explained or represented in stories, articles and editorials offered. It is being presented as news and news only. Further, the content of thecritical-post.com (TCP)CHICAGO – The Critical Post does not constitute advice or a recommendation by thecritical-post.com (TCP)CHICAGO – The Critical Post and should not be relied upon in making (or refraining from making) any decision relating to the material presented here.

Neither thecritical-post.com (TCP)CHICAGO – The Critical Post nor its staff nor its sponsors, its ISP of any contibutors to the site can be held liable or responsible in any way for any opinions, suggestions, recommendations or comments made by any of the contributors to the various materials on this site…nor do opinions of contributors necessarily reflect those thecritical-post.com (TCP)CHICAGO – The Critical Post, et al.

In no event shall thecritical-post.com (TCP)CHICAGO – The Critical Post, its staff, its sponsors, its contributors or its ISP be liable for any damages whatsoever, including, without limitation, direct, special, indirect, consequential, or incidental damages, or damages for lost profits, loss of revenue, or loss of use, arising out of or related to the thecritical-post.com (TCP)CHICAGO – The Critical Post internet site or the information contained in it, whether such damages arise in contract, negligence, tort, under statute, in equity, at law or otherwise.

Translation App

AfrikaansAlbanianArabicArmenianAzerbaijaniBasqueBelarusianBulgarianCatalanChinese (Simplified)Chinese (Traditional)CroatianCzechDanishDutchEnglishEstonianFilipinoFinnishFrenchGalicianGeorgianGermanGreekHaitian CreoleHebrewHindiHungarianIcelandicIndonesianIrishItalianJapaneseKoreanLatvianLithuanianMacedonianMalayMalteseNorwegianPersianPolishPortugueseRomanianRussianSerbianSlovakSlovenianSpanishSwahiliSwedishThaiTurkishUkrainianUrduVietnameseWelshYiddish

Staff Notes To Readers

We are continually looking to improve our performance for this readership. Please leave suggestions in any particular comment box for any article.

If you're a reporter, we'd enjoy hearing from you.

We appreciate your continued support and visitations.

Thank You - (TCP)CHICAGO Staff

  • Pat Buchanan: "Where Many Americans See Illegal Intruders, Democrats See Future Voters" June 19, 2018
    Authored by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org, “It is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart,” says former first lady Laura Bush of the Trump administration policy of “zero tolerance,” under which the children of illegal migrants are being detained apart from their parents. “Disgraceful,” adds Dr. Franklin Graham. “We need to be … […]
    Tyler Durden
  • Russia And India Ditch Dollar In Military Deals June 19, 2018
    With the US increasingly willing to use the dollar, and SWIFT, as a strategic weapon against the country's sovereign enemies (as Iran learned every 5 or so years), Russia and India are preparing to bypass US sanctions on Moscow by using the rupee and the ruble in bilateral trade involving military deals, the Economic Times […]
    Tyler Durden
  • Trump Doubles Down On Immigrant Crackdown: Vows To Stop Illegals Who "Infest" The US June 19, 2018
    President Trump lashed out at Democrats in a series of morning tweets on immigration - the latest defense of his administration's new "zero tolerance" policy of enforcing rules created and enforced under the Bush and Obama administrations - while the left is now making "internment camp" comparisons. "Democrats are the problem," said Trump. "They don’t care […]
    Tyler Durden
  • Trump To Withdraw From UN Human Rights Council Today June 19, 2018
    Two years after Russia was kicked out of the UN Human Rights Council, while that paragon of humanitarian virtue Saudi Arabia was reelected, the WaPo reports that the Trump administration is set to withdrawal from the United Nations Human Rights Council as soon as today, making good on a pledge to leave a body that […]
    Tyler Durden
  • The Corporate Yield Curve Has Just Inverted June 19, 2018
    Just days after we first showed that the world's "Most Systemically Important Banks", or G-SIFIs, are tumbling even as US stocks trade just shy of all time highs, prompting Ian Hartnett to issue his first "black swan" alert since 2009... ... Nedbank analysts Neels Heyneke and Mehul Dahya picked up on this topic, and in […]
    Tyler Durden
  • John McAfee Says He's No Longer Pitching ICOs "Due To SEC Threats" June 19, 2018
    The SEC crackdown on ICOs has, apparently, finally extended to one of the industry's most enthusiastic and prolific promoters: former software security pioneer John McAfee, who has earned a reputation for outrageous behavior (including promising in July 2017 to eat his dick on national television if bitcoin doesn't hit $500,000 in three years) in recent […]
    Tyler Durden
  • EU Backs Effort To Prosecute Israeli Military Officials For Human Rights Violations June 19, 2018
    Via Middle East Monitor, The European Union is funding a project to prosecute Israel Defence Forces (IDF) officers for committing violations against Palestinian civilians, according to Israel Hayom, which quotes a local human rights organisation. The pro-Israel group NGO Monitor analyses the funding and performance of non-governmental organisations which keep an eye on violations committed by […]
    Tyler Durden
  • Kim Makes Third Trip To Beijing This Year For Meeting With President Xi June 19, 2018
    In the wake of what US (and international) media celebrated as a diplomatic victory for North Korean leader Kim Jong Un during last week's US-North Korea summit in Singapore, Kim on Tuesday traveled to Beijing for a two-day visit, where he filled Chinese President Xi Jinping in on the details of his discussion with President […]
    Tyler Durden
  • WHO Classifies "Gaming Addiction" As A Mental Health Disorder June 19, 2018
    Authored by Mac Slavo via SHTFplan.com, The World Health Organization has just announced that an addiction to video games, dubbed a “gaming addiction” is now a mental health disorder. The WHO also said that “gaming disorder” is a unique mental health condition. The World Health Organization announced “gaming disorder” as a new mental health condition […]
    Tyler Durden
  • Dow Tumbles 400 Points, Back In The Red For 2018 June 19, 2018
    Meanwhile, Nasdaq is still up 10% year-to-date... Dow down 400 points today erases what's left of its 2018 gains.. But all major indices are still green in June... And 10Y Treasury yields dropped as low as 2.85% this morning...
    Tyler Durden
  • Ross shorted Russian-linked shipping company ahead of Paradise Papers June 18, 2018
    The U.S. Commerce Secretary shorted stock in Navigator Holdings just days after reporters informed him they were about to reveal his holdings in the firm. The post Ross shorted Russian-linked shipping company ahead of Paradise Papers appeared first on ICIJ.
    Sasha Chavkin
  • Swiss authorities propose major money-laundering law reforms June 11, 2018
    Switzerland’s federal government appears poised to crack down on money laundering in the wake of Panama Papers. The post Swiss authorities propose major money-laundering law reforms appeared first on ICIJ.
    Martha M. Hamilton
  • One Company’s Tax ‘Heaven’ Is Senegal’s Tax ‘Hell’ May 22, 2018
    A lopsided tax treaty between Mauritius and Senegal means, with the right paper work, companies working in Senegal can avoid paying millions in taxes. The post One Company’s Tax ‘Heaven’ Is Senegal’s Tax ‘Hell’ appeared first on ICIJ.
    Will Fitzgibbon
  • Why We Decided To Dig Into West Africa’s Offshore Links May 22, 2018
    Through the power of collaborative reporting, ICIJ and its partners have been able to shed new light on the impact of tax avoidance, financial crime and corruption in West Africa. The post Why We Decided To Dig Into West Africa’s Offshore Links appeared first on ICIJ.
    Will Fitzgibbon
  • ‘We are the enemies of our leaders’: Meet the journalists behind West Africa Leaks May 22, 2018
    The 13 journalists who worked on the West Africa Leaks face everything from threats, law suits and intimidation. The post ‘We are the enemies of our leaders’: Meet the journalists behind West Africa Leaks appeared first on ICIJ.
    Will Fitzgibbon
  • Wanted: Honorary Consuls For ‘Cash-Strapped’ African Nations May 22, 2018
    Honorary consuls occupy a little-known niche in the global elite. Many work to rigorous standards, but for others their avowed love for their adopted country is not always reflected in their tax filings. The post Wanted: Honorary Consuls For ‘Cash-Strapped’ African Nations appeared first on ICIJ.
    Will Fitzgibbon
  • Explore The Stories May 22, 2018
    See how offshore companies and accounts have been used to strip cash out of West Africa. The post Explore The Stories appeared first on ICIJ.
    Hilary Fung
  • How Officials, Businesses and Traffickers Hide Billions from Cash-Starved Governments Offshore May 22, 2018
    From Cape Verde’s white-sand beaches to Niger’s vast deserts, West African countries are plundered by companies and individuals, while governments do little to stem the flow. The post How Officials, Businesses and Traffickers Hide Billions from Cash-Starved Governments Offshore appeared first on ICIJ.
    Will Fitzgibbon
  • Fossil fuel funds have unlikely investors: environmental icons May 16, 2018
    The latest dive into the Paradise Papers by U.S. reporters has discovered nonprofits making contradictory investments. The post Fossil fuel funds have unlikely investors: environmental icons appeared first on ICIJ.
    Sasha Chavkin
  • UK backs Panama Papers crackdown on ‘dirty money’ havens May 1, 2018
    The U.K. will force its overseas territories, including some well-known corporate secrecy havens, to reveal the names of company owners in these locations. The post UK backs Panama Papers crackdown on ‘dirty money’ havens appeared first on ICIJ.
    Simon Bowers

Support The Critical Post – – Click This Ad

Support The Critical Post – – Click This Ad